Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher

• Ackermann, E. (2012). Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Y. B. Kafai, & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice (pp. 39-50). Routledge.
• Adler, J. (2005). Mathematics for teaching: What is it and why is it important that we talk about it? Pythagoras, 62, 2-11. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v0i62.109
• Adler, J., & Venkat, H. (2014). Teachers’ mathematical discourse in instruction. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883090
• Akgul, S., & Kahveci, N. G. (2016). A study on the development of a mathematics creativity scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(62). https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.5
• Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E. D., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6
• Askew, M., Venkat, H., & Mathews, C. (2012). Coherence and consistency in South African primary mathematics lessons. In Proceedings of the 36^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 27-34). PME.
• Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., & Valero, P. (2011). Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0
• Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
• Awofala, A. O., Lawal, R. F., Arigbabu, A. A., & Fatade, A. O. (2020). Mathematics productive disposition as a correlate of senior secondary school students’ achievement in mathematics in Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1362-1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1815881
• Baker, B., Cooley, L., & Trigueros, M. (2000). A calculus graphing schema. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 557-578. https://doi.org/10.2307/749887
• Ball, D. L. (2003). What mathematical knowledge is needed for teaching mathematics? Secretary’s Summit on Mathematics. http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/Situations/Framework%20Folder/Framework.Jan08/articles/Ball2003Math%20Summit.pdf
• Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 4, 433-456.
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding: Foundations and evolving definition. In B. R. Belland (Ed.), Instructional scaffolding in STEM education (pp. 17-53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_2
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21^st century skills (pp. 17-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
• Bonk, C. J., & King, K. S. (2012). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. Y. Bonk (Ed.), Electronic collaborators (pp. 61-86). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053805-10
• Cobern, W. W. (2012). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053409-9
• Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044408-14
• Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(2), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90015-2
• Czarnocha, B., Dubinsky, E., Prabhu, V., & Vidakovic, D. (1999). One theoretical perspective in undergraduate mathematics education research. In Proceedings of the PME Conference (pp. 1-95). PME.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
• Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Complex constructivism: A theoretical model of complexity and cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 485-498.
• Dubinsky, E. (1991). Constructive aspects of reflective abstraction in advanced mathematics. In L. P. Steffe (Eds.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 160-202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3178-3_9
• Dubinsky, E., Assiala, M., Cottrill, J., & Schwingendorf, K. E. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 399-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90015-8
• Ernest, P. (2013). Varieties of constructivism: A framework for comparison. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, B. Sriraman, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 347-362). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053126-27
• Eun, B. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941
• Faizah, A. M. (2011). Creativity and innovation in research: The perceptions of Malaysian postgraduate students. Asian Journal of University Education, 6(1), 49-74.
• Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). Macmillan.
• Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
• Gourdeau, F. (2019). Problem solving as a subject and as a pedagogical approach, and the ongoing dialogue between mathematics and mathematics education. In P. Felmer, P. Liljedahl, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Problem solving in mathematics instruction and teacher professional development (pp. 23-42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29215-7_2
• Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312906
• Gyuse, E., Achor, E. E., & Chianson, M. (2014). How creative are secondary school students in Nigeria? In Proceedings of the 55^th Annual Conference of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria on STM Education & Creativity (pp. 146-159).
• Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975-2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
• Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034819
• Jiboye, T. F., Salaudeen, G. O., Adejumo, O. O., & Aikomo, D. O. (2019). Mental ability, self-esteem and learning styles as correlate of creativity among high achieving secondary school students in Oyo State. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4(4), 24-43.
• Kang, N. H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y
• Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1-3), 26. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1471
• Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
• Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129-145). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_010
• Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8
• Leikin, R., Subotnik, R., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Singer, F., & Pelczer, I. (2013). Teachers’ views on creativity in mathematics education and international survey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0472-4
• Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: Focusing on teachers’ conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.550715
• Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In M. Kooy, & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters (pp. 42-64). Routledge.
• Maharaj, A. (2013). An APOS analysis of natural science students’ understanding of derivatives. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n1a458
• Makonye, J. P. (2017). Pre-service mathematics student teachers’ conceptions of nominal and effective interest rates. Pythagoras, 38(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v38i1.307
• Mathews, D., & Clark, J. (2003). Successful students’ conceptions of mean, standard deviation and the central limit theorem. https://causeweb.org/cause/research/literature/successful-students-conceptions-mean-standard-deviation-and-central-limit
• McPhail, G. (2016). The fault lines of recontextualisation: The limits of constructivism in education. British Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 294-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3199
• Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2015). Theories of human development. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871240
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
• Palermos, S. O. (2014). Knowledge and cognitive integration. Synthese, 191(8), 1931-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0383-0
• Patel, V. (2013). Construction and standardization of creativity test in Hindi for the students of upper primary school. Education, 2(4).
• Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s Theory. In P. H. Mussen, & W. Kessen (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. I History, Theory, and Methods (pp. 41-102). John Wiley.
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Forthmann, B., & Barbot, B. (2019). Scoring divergent thinking tests: A review and systematic framework. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000227
• Renatovna, A. G., & Renatovna, A. S. (2021). Pedagogical and psychological conditions of preparing students for social relations on the basis of the development of critical thinking. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 4889-4902. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.2886
• Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
• Rowland, T. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: Reflecting on practice with the knowledge quartet. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279571
• Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and using the ‘knowledge quartet’: A framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107-124.
• Runco, M. A. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3-19). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
• Runco, M. A., & Kim, D. (2020). Four Ps of creativity and recent updates. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 996-1001). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_429
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114
• Siyepu, S. W. (2013). An exploration of students’ errors in derivatives in a university of technology. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.05.001
• Smagorinsky, P. (2018). Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009
• Sriraman, B., & Haavold, P. (2017). Creativity and giftedness in mathematics education: A pragmatic view. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_16
• Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75390
• Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2012). Measuring multiple intelligences and moral sensitivities in education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-758-5
• Torrance, E. P. (1967). Understanding the fourth grade slump in creative thinking: Final report. ERIC.
• Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9201-5
• Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195-212.
• Waite-Stupiansky, S. (2017). Jean Piaget’s constructivist theory of learning. In Theories of early vhildhood education (pp. 3-17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641560-1
• Wang, Y. (2009). On abstract intelligence: Toward a unifying theory of natural, artificial, machinable, and computational intelligence. International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence, 1(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/jssci.2009010101
• Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: A conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689-5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w
• Wardani, S., & Sumarmo, U. (2011). Mathematical creativity and disposition: Experiment with grade-10 students using silver inquiry approach. Journal of Science and Mathematics Teaching, GUNMA University, 59, 1.

APA

Tsafe, A. K. (2024). Effective mathematics learning through APOS theory by dint of cognitive abilities. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2), em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308

Vancouver

Tsafe AK. Effective mathematics learning through APOS theory by dint of cognitive abilities. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2024;4(2):em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308

AMA

Tsafe AK. Effective mathematics learning through APOS theory by dint of cognitive abilities. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2024;4(2), em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308

Chicago

Tsafe, A. K.. "Effective mathematics learning through APOS theory by dint of cognitive abilities". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2024 4 no. 2 (2024): em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308

Harvard

Tsafe, A. K. (2024). Effective mathematics learning through APOS theory by dint of cognitive abilities. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2), em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308

MLA

Tsafe, A. K. "Effective mathematics learning through APOS theory by dint of cognitive abilities". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 4, no. 2, 2024, em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308