Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher

• Dienes, Z. P. (1963). An experimental study of mathematics learning. Hutchinson.
• Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9072-y
• Fello, S. E., & Paquette, K. R. (2009). Talking and writing in the classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(7), 410-414. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.14.7.0410
• González, G., & Herbst, P. G. (2009). Students’ conceptions of congruency through the use of dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(2), 153-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9152-z
• Herbst, P. (2004). Interaction with diagrams and the making of reasoned conjectures in geometry. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik [Central Journal for Didactic of Mathematics], 36(5), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655665
• Herbst, P. (2005). Knowing about ‘‘equal area’’ while proving a claim about equal areas. Recherches en Didactique des Mathe´matiques [Research in Didactics of Mathematics], 25(1), 11-56.
• Herbst, P. (2006). Teaching geometry with problems: Negotiating instructional situations and mathematical tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 313-347.
• Kastberg, S. E., Norton, A., & Klerlein, J. T. (2009). Trusting students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(7), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.14.7.0423
• King, J., & Schattschneider, D. (1997). Preface: Making geometry dynamic. In J. R. King, & D. Schattschneider (Eds.), Geometry turned on! Dynamic software in learning, teaching, and research (pp. ix-xiv). The Mathematical Association of America.
• Laborde, C, Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strässer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutiérrez, & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future, (pp. 275-304). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_011
• Lingefjärd, T., & Ghosh, J. (2016). Learning mathematics as an interplay between internal and external representations. Far East Journal of Mathematical Education, 16(3), 271-297. https://doi.org/10.17654/ME016030271
• Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1), 87-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012785106627
• Mayer, R., & Sims, V. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3) 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389
• Mesquita, A. (1998). On conceptual obstacles linked with external representation in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80058-5
• Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9116-6
• Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2
• Pea, R. D. (1987). Cognitive technologies in mathematics education. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Erlbaum.
• Sherman, M. (2014). The role of technology in extending students’ mathematical thinking: Extending the metaphors of amplifier and reorganizer. Contemporary Issues in Technology and teacher Education, 14(3), 220-246.
• Stokero, S.L., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2011). Making student thinking public. Mathematics Teacher, 104(9), 704-709. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.104.9.0704
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G.W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education, A perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1169-1207). Information Age.

APA

Lingefjärd, T., & Ghosh, J. (2022). Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318

Vancouver

Lingefjärd T, Ghosh J. Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2022;2(2):em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318

AMA

Lingefjärd T, Ghosh J. Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2022;2(2), em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318

Chicago

Lingefjärd, Thomas, and Jonaki Ghosh. "Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2022 2 no. 2 (2022): em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318

Harvard

Lingefjärd, T., and Ghosh, J. (2022). Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318

MLA

Lingefjärd, Thomas et al. "Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022, em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318