Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education

Dharmendra Kumar Yadav; Sanjay Kumar; Laklalech Nadia; Awadh Bihari Yadav

doi:10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

Full Text (PDF)

Dharmendra Kumar Yadav ¹ ^* , Sanjay Kumar ² , Laklalech Nadia ³ , Awadh Bihari Yadav ⁴

More Detail

¹ Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Bihar, INDIA² Amity University Patna, Bihar, INDIA³ Ryad Al Maarifa Institute, Rabat, MOROCCO⁴ C. M. Science College, Darbhanga, Bihar, INDIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Today the teacher does not focus on knowledge oriented but on result oriented teaching of mathematics in which s(he) focuses on the probable topics that may be asked in mid and end term examinations, so that maximum students can get good grades. Feedback from students and student centric teaching has bounded a teacher to complete the curriculum within a fixed time period and the students’ examination centric study has compelled the teachers to focus on examination oriented teaching. The concept of multiplicity plays an important role in it. Introducing its concepts in definitions, properties, named theorems and examples, we get the concept of recent trends of examination oriented teaching of mathematics. In the paper it has been shown that how the role of multiplicity is applied and how it has been destroying mathematics quality education.

Keywords

quality education
teaching methodology
examination
multiplicity

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2024, Article No: em055

https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

Publication date: 01 Jan 2024

Online publication date: 06 Dec 2023

Article Views: 1388

Article Downloads: 846

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abell, S. K. (2013). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1149). Routledge.
Aguilar Batista, J. J. (2017). Modeling through model-eliciting activities: A comparison among students at different performance levels [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin].
Al Mutawah, M. A. (2015). The influence of mathematics anxiety in middle and high school students math achievement. International Education Studies, 8(11), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p239
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107.
Apple, M. W. (2012). Can education change society? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203083550
Atta, S. A., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Teaching mathematics for social justice: The challenges and the prospects in the Ghanaian senior high schools. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em033. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13082
Ball, S. J. (2021). The education debate. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv201xhz5
Barton, B., Ell, F., Miller, B. K., & Thomas, M. (2012). Teaching undergraduate mathematics: Perspectives and interactions. http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9285_Summary.pdf
Basar, T. (2021). Evaluation of middle-school 6^th grade mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.332.9
Bowles, T., Hattie, J., Dinham, S., Scull, J., & Clinton, J. (2014). Proposing a comprehensive model for identifying teaching candidates. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(4), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0146-z
Brewster, B. J., & Miller, T. (2023). Reflections on mathematics ability, anxiety, and interventions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0729. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12822
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315004914
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives, & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 66-82). Taylor & Francis Group.
Castelino, A. D., & Hegde, C. (2019). COURSE 8 Pedagogy of school subject–II(b) MATHEMATICS (Curriculum and pedagogic studies) BLOCKS 1 & 2 (Part-1). Mangalore University.
Cynthia, E.-E. A., Edith, E. C., & Usman, B. (2019). Strategies for promoting primary school pupils’ understanding of mathematical concepts in Onitsha South Local Government Area, Anambra State. JECAPE, 2(2), 113-126.
Da, N. T. (2023). Realistic mathematics education and authentic learning: A combination of teaching mathematics in high schools. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em029. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13061
Education–Wikipedia. (n. d.). Education. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education
Elbaz, F. (2018). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454615
Examination–Wikipedia. (n. d.). Examination. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination
Fenstermacher, G. D., Soltis, J. F., & Sanger, M. N. (2015). Approaches to teaching. Teachers College Press.
Ficken, F. A. (2015). The simplex method of linear programming. Courier Dover Publications.
Fosu, M., Arthur, Y. D., Boateng, F. O., & Adu-Obeng, B. (2023). Mediation and moderation effect of mathematics interest and teaching quality between self-concept and mathematics achievement. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em024. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12622
Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Teachers College Record, 116(13), 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601319
Gannon, K. (2018). How to create a syllabus. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-to-create-a-syllabus/
Godunov, S. K. (1997). Ordinary differential equations with constant coefficient. American Mathematical Soc. https://doi.org/10.1090/mmono/169
Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. OECD.
Horzum, T., & Yildiz, E. (2023). Examination of middle school mathematics textbooks in terms of values. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0731. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12908
Hu, B., & West, A. (2015). Exam-oriented education and implementation of education policy for migrant children in urban China. Educational Studies, 41(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.977780
Isah, A. I., & Tella, Y. (2015). The concept of multiset category. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 9(5), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2015/18415
Karachik, V. V. (2012). Method for constructing solutions of linear ordinary differential equations with constant coefficients. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 52(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542512020108
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students : Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36
Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003
Mackatiani, C. I. (2017). Influence of examinations oriented approaches on quality education in primary schools in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 51-58.
Makeleni, N. T., & Sethusha, M. J. (2014). The experiences of foundation phase teachers in implementing the curriculum. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n2p103
Malambo, P., Kazika, G. M., & Phiri, P. A. (2023). Impact of the activity and reality principles on learners’ achievement regarding systems of linear equations. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em022. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12609
Mathematics–Wikipedia. (n. d.). Mathematics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics
Ongcoy, P. J. B., Jasmin, D. R. A., Guiamal, I. P., Guinita, S. S., & Iligan, A. M. M. (2023). Experiences and mathematics anxiety of STEM students. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em028. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12870
Ozdemir, E., & Sezginsoy Seker, B. (2019). Investigation of mathematical anxiety of primary school students and comparison of metaphorical perceptions with classroom teachers. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 31(1), 167-191.
Park, M. H., Dimitrov, D. M., & Park, D. Y. (2018). Effects of background variables of early childhood teachers on their concerns about inclusion: The mediation role of confidence in teaching. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2017.1417926
Park, M. H., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D. Y. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15614040
Potari, D. (2017). The quality of mathematics teaching: A central goal in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(6), 515-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9391-1
Prewett, S. L., Bergin, D. A., & Huang, F. L. (2019). Student and teacher perceptions on student-teacher relationship quality: A middle school perspective. School Psychology International, 40(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318807743
Ratnam-Lim, C. T. L., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.1001319
Segal, R., Oxman, V., & Stupel, M. (2021). Using dynamic geometry software to enhance specialized content knowledge: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0647. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11065
Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., Garn, A., Kulik, N., & Fahlman, M. (2015). The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12089
Steele, M. D., & Rogers, K. C. (2012). Relationships between mathematical knowledge for teaching and teaching practice: the case of proof. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9204-5
Trigwell, K. (2012). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science, 40, 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9192-3
Van Driel, J. H. (2021). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In J. H. Van Driel (Ed.), Science teachers’ knowledge development (pp. 1-37). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004505452_001
Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.902526
Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2013). Classroom debate as a systematic teaching/learning approach. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(11), 1506-1513.

How to cite this article

APA

Yadav, D. K., Kumar, S., Nadia, L., & Yadav, A. B. (2024). Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(1), em055. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

Vancouver

Yadav DK, Kumar S, Nadia L, Yadav AB. Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2024;4(1):em055. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

AMA

Yadav DK, Kumar S, Nadia L, Yadav AB. Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2024;4(1), em055. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

Chicago

Yadav, Dharmendra Kumar, Sanjay Kumar, Laklalech Nadia, and Awadh Bihari Yadav. "Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2024 4 no. 1 (2024): em055. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

Harvard

Yadav, D. K., Kumar, S., Nadia, L., and Yadav, A. B. (2024). Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(1), em055. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967

MLA

Yadav, Dharmendra Kumar et al. "Role of multiplicity in examination oriented teaching destroying mathematics quality education". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, em055. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13967