The species problem in evolution education
Full Text (PDF)
More Detail
1 Department of Biological Application and Technology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE2 Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE* Corresponding Author
Abstract
An issue that might concern the species problem is the understanding and acceptance of evolution by students. The reason is that some of the modern concepts, which have been developed to define the species category, do not fit the evolutionary theory. In addition, some other concepts are simply criteria for the delimitation of species taxa. In particular, the biological and morphological species concepts, which are present in every textbook and are used almost exclusively in the teaching of evolution, can intensify students’ essentialist perceptions. However, these perceptions could be effectively dealt with the development of the species problem and the nature of species taxa in the classroom, and also the treatment of species as one more level of organization of biological systems during teaching process. This approach is employed in a lesson with a view to contributing to the structure of a fully developed conceptual framework by the students in order to understand the evolution.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Review Article
Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2023, Article No: em035
https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120
Publication date: 26 Mar 2023
Article Views: 918
Article Downloads: 838
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- AAAS. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. AAAS.
- Agapow, P., Bininda-Edmunds, O. R. P., Crandall, K. A., Gittleman, J. L., Mace, G. M., Marshall, J. C., & Purvis, A. (2004). The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79(2), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1086/383542
- Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M, & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10053
- Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2012). Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 903-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.586072
- Baker, R. J., & Bradley, R. D. (2006). Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 643-662. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1
- Baum, D. A. (1998). Individuality and the existence of species through time. Systematic Biology, 47, 641-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351598260644
- Baum, D. A., & Shaw, K. L. (1995). Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In P. C. Hoch, & A. G. Stephenson (Eds.), Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics (pp. 289-303). Missouri Botanical Garden.
- Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1966). Folk taxonomies and biological classification. Science, 154, 273-275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3746.273
- Berti, A. E., Toneatti, L., & Rosati, V. (2010). Children’s conceptions about the origin of species: A study of Italian children’s conceptions with and without instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 506-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.508027
- Bird, A., & Tobin, E. (2008). Natural kinds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2008/entries/natural-kinds/
- Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
- Boyd R. (1999). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141-185). MIT Press.
- Boyd, R. (1991). Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies, 61, 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385837
- Brigandt, I. (2009). Natural kinds in evolution and systematics: Metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Acta Biotheoretica, 57(1-2), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-008-9056-7
- Burma, B. H. (1949). The species concept: A semantic review. Evolution, 3, 369-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405722
- Camargo, A., & Sites Jr, J. (2013). Species delimitation: A decade after the Renaissance. In I. Y. Pavlinov (Ed.), The species problem–ongoing issues (pp. 225-247). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/52664
- Catley, K. M. (2006). Darwin’s missing link–A novel paradigm for evolution education. Science Education, 90, 767-783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20152
- Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2008). Seeing the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. BioScience, 58(10), 976-987. https://doi.org/10.1641/B581011
- Christenhusz, M. J. (2020). On species concepts, phylogenetics and the science of natural history-tree current issues facing taxonomy. Megataxa, 001(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.14
- Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., & Wilson, M. R. (Eds.) (1997). Species: The units of biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, London.
- Cohan, F. T. (2019). Systematics: The cohesive nature of bacterial species taxa. Current Biology, 29, 150-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.033
- Coleman, W. (1962). Lyell and the “reality” of species: 1830-1833. Isis, 53(3), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1086/349595
- Coley, J. D., & Muratore, T. M. (2012). Trees, fish, and other fictions: Folk biological thought and its implications for understanding evolutionary biology. In K.R. Rosengren, S. Brem, E.M. Evans, & G. Sinartra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Intergrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0002
- Cracraft, J. (2000). Species concepts in theoretical and applied biology: A systematic debate with consequences. In Q. D. Wheeler, & R. Meier (Eds.), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory (pp. 3-14). Columbia University Press.
- Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82303
- Dawkins, R. (2009). The greatest show on earth. Free Press.
- de Queiroz, K. (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. A conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In D. J. Howard (Ed.), Endless forms. Species and speciation (pp. 57-75). Oxford University Press.
- de Queiroz, K. (1999). The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 49-89). MIT Press.
- de Queiroz, K. (2005a). Different species problems and their resolution. BioEssays, 27, 1263-1269. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20325
- de Queiroz, K. (2005b). Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 6600-6607. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502030102
- de Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56(6), 879-886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083
- de Queiroz, K. (2011). Branches in the lines of descent: Charles Darwin and the evolution of the species concept. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 103, 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01634.x
- Devitt, M. (2008). Resurrecting biological essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 75(3), 344-382. https://doi.org/10.1086/593566
- Dial, D., Emetu, N., & Andrews, T. C. (2019). A community-informed list of key speciation concepts for undergraduate education. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(14), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0105-2
- Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetic nature of species differences. The American Naturalist , 71, 404-420. https://doi.org/10.1086/280726
- Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press.
- Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
- Dunk, R. D. P., Barnes, M. P., Reiss, M. J., Alters, B. Asghar, A., Carter, B. E., Cotner, S., Glaze, A. L., Hawley, P. H., Jensen, J. L., Mead, L. S., Nadelson, L. S., Nelson, C. E., Pobiner, B., Scott, E. C., Shtulman, A., Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., Walter, E. M., … Dunk, J. R. W. (2019). Evolution education is a complex landscape. Nature, Ecology and Evolution, 3, 327-329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0802-9
- Dupré, J. (1981). Natural kinds and biological taxa. The Philosophical Review, 90(1), 66-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184373
- Eigen, E. A. (1997). Overcoming first impressions: Georges Cuvier’s types. Journal of the History of Biology, 30(2), 179-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004227517928
- Ellis, M. W. (2011). The problem with the species problem. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 33, 343-364.
- Ellis, M. W., & Wolf, P.G. (2010). “Teaching ‘species’”. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0193-5
- Ereshefsky, M. (1997). The evolution of the linnaean hierarchy. Biology and Philosophy, 12, 493-519. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006556627052
- Ereshefsky, M. (1998). Species pluralism and anti-realism. Philosophy of Science, 65, 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/392628
- Ereshefsky, M. (2009). Darwin’s solution to species problem. Synthese, 175, 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9538-4
- Ereshefsky, M. (2010). What’s wrong with the new biological essentialism? Philosophy of Science, 77, 674-685. https://doi.org/10.1086/656545
- Garnett, S. T., & Christidis, L. (2017). Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation. Nature, 446, 25-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/546025a
- Gelman, S. A., & Rhodes, M. (2012). “Two- thousand years of stasis”: How psychological essentialism impedes evolutionary understanding. In K.R. Rosengren, S. Brem, E.M. Evans, & G. Sinartra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Intergrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0001
- Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23(4), 536. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412471
- Ghiselin, M. T. (1985). Mayr versus Darwin on paraphyletic taxa. Systematic Zoology, 34(4), 460-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/2413209
- Ghiselin, M. T. (1987). Species, individuality, and objectivity. Biology and Philosophy, 2, 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057958
- Ghiselin, M. T. (2002). Species concepts: The basis for controversy and reconciliation. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00084.x
- Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
- Hausdorf, B. (2011). Progress toward a general species concept. Evolution, 65(4), 923-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01231.x
- Hazelwood, C. C. (2018). The species category as a scientific kind. Synthese, 198(Suppl 12), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02025-4
- Hey, J. (2001). The mind of the species problem. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 326-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02145-0
- Hey, J. (2006). On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(8), 447-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.011
- Hong, D.‐Y. (2020). Gen‐morph species concept–A new and integrative species concept for outbreeding organisms. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 58(5), 725-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12660
- Hull, D. L. (1967). The metaphysics of evolution. The British Journal for the History of Science, 3(4), 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400002892
- Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412744
- Hull, D. L. (1987). Genealogical actors in ecological roles. Biology and Philoshophy, 2, 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057961
- Hull, D. L. (1997). The ideal species concept–and why we can’t get it. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, & M. R. Wilson (Eds.), Species: The units of biodiversity (pp. 357-380). Chapman and Hall.
- Κampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding evolution. Campridge University Press.
- Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9075-9
- Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science and Education, 18(10), 1313-1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9171-5
- Kluge, A. G. (1990). Species as historical individuals. Biology & Philosophy, 5, 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207380
- Kornet, D. J. (1993). Permanent splits as speciation events: A formal recostruction of the internodal species concept. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 164, 407-435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1164
- Kottler, M. J. (1978). Charles Darwin’s biological species concept and theory of geographic speciation: The transmutation notebooks. Annals of Science, 35(3), 275-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797800200251
- Lamark, J. B. (1914). Zoological Philosophy: An exposition with regard to the natural history of animals (Translated by H. Elliot). London Macmillan.
- Larson, J. L. (1968). The species concept of Linnaeus. Isis, 59(3), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1086/350398
- Mallet, J. (2007). Species, concepts of. In S. Levin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity (pp. 679-691). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00254-6
- Mallet, J. (2010). Why was Darwin’s view of species rejected by twentieth century biologists? Biology and Philosophy, 25, 497-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9213-7
- Mallet, J. (2020). Alternative views of biological species: Reproductively isolated units or genotypic clusters? Genetics and Molecular Biology, 7, 1400-1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa116
- Mallet, J., Besansky N., & Hahn M. W. (2016) How reticulated are species? BioEssays, 38, 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500149
- Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, & M. R. Wilson (Eds.), Species: The units of biodiversity (pp. 381-423). Chapman and Hall.
- Mayden, R. L. (2002). On biological species, species concepts and individuation in the natural world. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00086.x
- Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Belknap Press.
- Mayr, E. (1987). The ontological status of species: scientific progress and philosophical terminology. Biology and Philosophy, 2(2), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057959
- Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Penguin Books.
- Mayr, E. (1996). What is a species, and what is not? Philosophy of Science, 2, 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1086/289912
- Mayr, E. (2000). The biological species concept. In Q. D. Wheeler, & R. Meier (Eds.), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory (pp. 17-29). Columbia University Press.
- Meier, R., & Willman, R. (2000). The Hennigian species concept. In Q. D. Wheeler, & R. Meier (Eds.), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory (pp. 30-43). Columbia University Press.
- Meisel, R. P. (2010). Teaching tree-thinking to undergraduate biology students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0254-9
- Mendelson, T. M., & Shaw, K. L. (2012). The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(8), 421-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.04.001
- Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765-766. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126746
- Minelli, A. (2015). Taxonomy faces speciation: The origin of species or the fading out of the species? Biodiversity Journal, 6(1), 123-138.
- Mishler, B. D. (1985). The morphological, developmental, and phylogenetic basis of species concepts in bryophytes. Bryologist, 88, 207-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/3243030
- Mishler, B. D., & Donoghue, M. J. (1982). Species concepts: A case for pluralism. Systematic Zoology, 31, 491-503. https://doi.org/10.2307/2413371
- Mishler, B. D., & Theriot, E. C. (2000). The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): Monophyly, apomorphy, and the phylogenetic species concepts. In Q. D. Wheeler, & R. Meier (Eds.), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory (pp. 44-54). Columbia University Press.
- Mishler, B. D., & Wilkins J. S. (2018). The hunting of the SNaRC : A snarky solution th the species problem. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0010.001
- Moritz, C. (1994). Defining ‘evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90057-4
- Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. A. (2009). Development and preliminary evaluation of the measure of understanding of macroevolution: Introducing the MUM. Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), 151-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903292983
- Naomi, S.-I. (2011). On the integrated frameworks of species concepts: Mayden’s hierarchy of species concepts and de Queiroz’s unified concept of species. Journal Zoological Systematics Evolutionary Research, 49(3), 177-184. https://doi:10.1111/j.1439-0469.2011.00618.x
- Nathan, M. J., & Cracraft, J. (2020). The nature of species in evolution. In S. M. Scheiner, & D. P. Mindell (Eds.), The theory of evolution: Principles, concepts and assumptions. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226671338.001.0001
- Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. Bioscience, 57(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311
- Novick, L. R., Schreiber, E. G., & Catley, K. M. (2014). Deconstructing evolution education: The relationship between micro- and macroevolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 759-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21161
- Nyléhn, J., & Ødegaard, M. (2018). The species concept as a gateway to nature of science. Science & Education, 27, 685-714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0007-7
- Oxenham, M. F. (2015). Lamarck on species and evolution. In A. Behie, & M. Oxenham (Eds.), Taxonomic tapestries: The threads of evolutionary, behavioral and conservation research (pp. 155-170). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/TT.05.2015.08
- Padian, K. (1999). Charles Darwin’s view of classification in theory and practice. Systematic Biology, 48(2), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351599260337
- Paterson, H. E. H. (1993). Evolution and the recognition concept of species. Collected writings. John Hopkins University Press.
- Pleijel, F., & Rouse, G. W. (2000). Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: A new taxonomic concept for biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B267(1443), 627-630. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1048
- Pobiner, B. (2016). Accepting, understanding, teaching, and learning (human) evolution: Obstacles and opportunities. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 159(S61), S232-S274. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22910
- Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., Müller, I., Baglione, V., Urmeberg, P., Wikelski,M., Grabherr, M. G., & Wolf, J. B. W. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253226
- Price, R. M., & Perez, K. E. (2009). Beyond the adaptationist legacy: Updating our teaching to include a diversity of evolutionary mechanisms. The American Biology Teacher, 78(2), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2016.78.2.101
- Prinou, L., Halkia, K., & Skordoulis, C. (2008). What conceptions do Greek school students form about biological evolution? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0051-x
- Pušic, B., Gregorić, P., & Franjević D., (2017). What do biologists make of the species problem? Acta Biotheoretica, 65, 179-209. https://doi:10.1007/s10441-017-9311-x
- Reydon, T. A. (2005). On the nature of the species problem and the four meanings of “species”. Studies in History and Philosophy of biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.12.004
- Richards, R. A. (2010). The species problem: A philosophical analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762222
- Ridley, M. (1989). The cladistic solution to the species problem. Biology and Philosophy, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144036
- Rieppel, O. (2010). Species monophyly. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2009.00545.x
- Rosselló-Mora, R., & Amann, R. (2001). The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 25, 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(00)00040-1
- Samarapungavan, A., & Wries, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2102_2
- Seifert, B. (2014). A pragmatic species concept applicable to all eukaryotic organisms independent from their mode of reproduction or evolutionary history. Soil Organisms, 86, 85-93.
- Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001
- Shtulman, A. (2018). Missing links: How cladograms reify common evolutionary misconceptions. In K. Rutten, S. Blancke, & R. Soetaert (Eds.), Perspectives on science and culture (pp. 149-169). Purdue University Press.
- Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32,1049-1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210801897864
- Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, M. E. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0037-8
- Sneath, P. H. A. (1976). Phenetic taxonomy at the species level and above. Taxonomy, 25, 437-450. https://doi.org/10.2307/1220526
- Stamos, D. N. (2003). The species problem: Biological species, ontology, and the metaphysics of biology. Lexington Books.
- Stamos, D. N. (2013). Darwin’s species concept revisited. In I. Pavlinov (Ed.), The species problem-ongoing issues (pp. 251-280). InTech.
- Stanford, K. P. (1995). For pluralism and against realism about species. Philosophy of Science, 62(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1086/89840
- Stasinakis, P., & Kampourakis, K. (2018). Evolution education in Greece. In D. Hasan, & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution education around the globe (pp. 195-212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_11
- Templeton, A. R. (1989). The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. In D. Otte, & J. A. Endler (Eds.), Speciation and its consequences (pp. 3-27). Sinauer Association.
- Thomson, S. A., Pyle, R. L., Ahyong, S. T., Alonso-Zarazaga, M., Ammirati, J., Araya, J. F., Ascher, J. S., Audisio, T. L., Azevedo-Santos, V. M., Bailly, N., Baker, W. J., Balke, M., Barclay, M. V. L., Barrett, R. L., Benine, R. C., Bickerstaff, J. R. M., Bouchard, P., Bour, R., Bourgoin, T., … Zhou, H.-Z. (2018). Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation. PLoS Biology, 16(3), e2005075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075
- Van Valen, L. (1976). Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxonomy, 25, 233-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/1219444
- Velasco, J. D. (2008). Species concepts should not conflict with evolutionary history, but often do. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 39, 407-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.09.007
- Wang, X., Ziwen, H., Shi S., & Wu C. I. (2020). Genes and speciation: Is it time to abandon the biological species concept? Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Science Review, 7, 1387-1397. https://doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz220
- Wheeler, Q. D., & Platnick, N. I. (2000). The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick). In Q. D. Wheeler, & R. Meier (Eds.), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory (pp. 55-69). Columbia University Press.
- Wiley, E. O., & Mayden, R. L. (2000). The evolutionary species concept. In Q. D. Wheeler, & R. Meier (Eds.), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory (pp. 70-89). Columbia University Press.
- Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Species: A history of the idea. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520260856.001.0001
- Wilkins, J. S. (2010). What is a species? Essences and generation. Theory in Biosciences, 129, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0090-z
- Winsor, M. P. (2006a). Linnaeus’s biology was not essentialist. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 93(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[2:LBWNE]2.0.CO;2
- Winsor, M. P. (2006b). The creation of the essentialism story: An exercise in metahistory. History and Philosophy of Life Science, 28, 149-174.
- Wu, C.-I. (2001). The genic view of the process of speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 851-865. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00335.x
- Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species concepts in biology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44966-1
- Ziadie, M. A., & Andrews T. C. (2018). Moving evolution education forward: A systematic analysis of literature to identify gaps in collective knowledge for teaching. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 17, ar11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0190
How to cite this article
APA
Manikas, M., Leonardos, I., Sotiropoulos, K., & Plakitsi, K. (2023). The species problem in evolution education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em035. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120
Vancouver
Manikas M, Leonardos I, Sotiropoulos K, Plakitsi K. The species problem in evolution education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2023;3(1):em035. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120
AMA
Manikas M, Leonardos I, Sotiropoulos K, Plakitsi K. The species problem in evolution education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2023;3(1), em035. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120
Chicago
Manikas, Miltiadis, Ioannis Leonardos, Konstantinos Sotiropoulos, and Katerina Plakitsi. "The species problem in evolution education". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2023 3 no. 1 (2023): em035. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120
Harvard
Manikas, M., Leonardos, I., Sotiropoulos, K., and Plakitsi, K. (2023). The species problem in evolution education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em035. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120
MLA
Manikas, Miltiadis et al. "The species problem in evolution education". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 3, no. 1, 2023, em035. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120